Erie, PA View Cell Phone Number View Background Report. . Thomas A. Knobloch Erie, Pennsylvania . Even if those cases are distinguishable on the grounds offered by the majority, they are not so plainly or obviously so as to make reliance upon them unreasonable. The government concedes that the district court erred when it described one element of the 924(c)(1) offense as during and/or in relation to a drug crime, and it further concedes that the error was plain. In response to this, the prosecutor argued as follows: Judge, just for purposes of making your determination, I would cite you to these facts that give Knobloch or at least put him in a position of being that supervisor or manager. See United States v. Willett, 90 F.3d 404, 408 (9th Cir. To the extent Knobloch is contending that the record does not support the court's finding regarding his role in the offense, we conclude to the contrary. Davis had never been to Smith's trailer, had never been there before, didn't know what to do. I also agree with the majority that there was no plain error in the district court's reliance on testimony from another trial in concluding that Knobloch was a leader, organizer, or supervisor. J.A. Knobloch did not raise before the district court any of the three alleged errors he relies on before us.2 Accordingly, we will review Knobloch's judgment of conviction and sentence solely for plain error. at 27-28 (emphasis added). 3B1.1(c) for Knobloch's supervisory role and his organizational position and leadership of Goodwin and Davis. J.A. The contact is Paul D Knobloch. Moreover, we find no fault in the court's consideration of relevant testimony from another related trial. Search our database of over 100 million company and executive profiles. Twitter: @KenMcMillanTHR . 2K2.4. 2D1.1(b) (1), the government stressed that the firearms it was relying on for this purpose were those that were alleged in Count 3 to have been possessed in connection with the underlying offense charged in Count 2, i.e., the possession of the anabolic steroids in the apartment with intent to distribute. Other Paul Knobloch's; Court Records Found! Australia Pacific LNG. All rights reserved. 2d 508 (1993). The email address cannot be subscribed. 924(c)(1). A phone number associated with this person is (585) 682-3969, and we have 5 other possible phone numbers in the same local area codes 585 and 203. at 1776) (internal quotation marks omitted). The government did not ask the court to find a nexus between the possession of these weapons and the distribution to Davis. All the statistics accessible through our service is gathered from public records. At the change of plea hearing, the court asked Knobloch a number of questions to ensure that his plea was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Washington had received a sentence under 924(c) for his firearm as well as an enhancement pursuant to section 2K2.4 because he had armed his accomplice with another firearm. 1996) ("We find that the district court did not err in imposing the two-level enhancement on top of the 924(c) conviction because the commission of a drug trafficking crime with a gun, silencer and knife poses a greater risk than does the commission of the same crime with only a gun"); United States v. Washington, 44 F.3d 1271, 1280-81 (5th Cir. 3741; United States v. Oser, 107 F.3d 1080, 1088 (3d Cir. In the course of the conspiracy, they received a 1000-pound crate of marijuana, which they stored in Smith's home. Get this Times Union page for free from Thursday, May 27, 1937 RK 'CITY MAY 27, 1937 o w Deaths Walter 8. The Probation office disagreed with the dangerous weapon enhancement, and it referred specifically to Application Note 2 to 2K2.4, the provision upon which Knobloch relies before us. ; see also United States v. Bethancourt, 65 F.3d 1074, 1079 (3d Cir.1995). Thus, none of the cases cited by the government interprets Application Note 2. At one point, Knobloch sold Davis a bag of steroids. Past residents include Ashley Hayes, Melvin Eickley, Thomas Knobloch, Darin Hayes and John Watts. at 47. We have searched the record in vain, however, for any claim by Knobloch that he would have entered a different plea had the district court correctly described the necessary elements of the offense. We note, as well, that the record shows no prejudice to Knobloch from this alleged error. . Be the first to share your favorite memory, photo or story of Thomas. At the change of plea hearing, the court asked Knobloch a number of questions to ensure that his plea was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Police seized a loaded Glock 19, 9-mm handgun from Knobloch at the time of the arrest. We find none of the three cited cases persuasive on the relevant point because none of them undertakes any analysis of the Note or bases its legal conclusion on it. Knobloch Rd, Erie, PA. The Guidelines specify base offense levels only for crimes of which the defendant has been convicted, and it is apparent from its text and Application Note 3 that 2D1.1(b) (1) authorizes a specific offense characteristic enhancement only for a dangerous weapon possessed in connection with the offense of conviction giving rise to the base offense level to be enhanced.4. When they later searched Knobloch's apartment, they found two other handguns-a Spectre .45 with a laser sight and a TEC-9, 9-mm semi-automatic-and ammunition clips in close proximity to a large carton of anabolic steroids. The error committed by the district court in this case certainly was not clear or obvious. This calculation includes the consecutive mandatory 60-month sentence under 18 U.S.C. The materials presented through Clubset can be used to assist anyone learn about other people currently in their lives or find anyone from earlier period. Even though the plea agreement called for the dismissal of Count 2, the government urged only that the court find a nexus between the Spectre .45 and TEC-9 weapons and the possession of the anabolic steroids in the apartment, as alleged in that count. In determining Knobloch's sentence for the offenses in Counts 1, 4 and 5 to which he pled guilty, the district court grouped the marijuana conspiracy and steroid distribution offenses to arrive at a base offense level. at 75. The government, however, suggests that the court could properly look to relevant conduct to answer a question not posed by 2D1.1(b) (1), i.e., whether Knobloch possessed a dangerous weapon in connection with his possession of the carton of steroids in the apartment, an offense of which he had not been convicted and on which he was not being sentenced. Based on its finding of a nexus with the cache in the apartment, the court enhanced Knobloch's offense level under 2D1.1(b) (1) and sentenced him to 147 months of imprisonment. Edgar Knobloch: Narozen : 11. listopadu 1927 Praha eskoslovensko: mrt: 3. nora 2013 (ve v ku 85 let) Quillan Francie: Povoln: spisovatel a historik: Alma mater: Univerzita Karlova: Ocen n: spole nk Krlovsk geografick spole nosti: Seznam d l v Soubornm katalogu R: N kter data mohou pochzet z datov poloky. Ed.2d 142 (1997). In preparation for sentencing, the government and Knobloch filed objections to the recommendations in the Presentence Report. 2K2.4, Application Note 2 prohibits a district court from enhancing a defendants' offense level no matter how many weapons a defendant possesses if he is to receive a sentence for a 924(c) (1) violation as long as all of the weapons are possessed or used as part of the same course of conduct or common plan or scheme. at 26. Nonetheless, I would still reverse the district court on this issue because U.S.S.G. Previous cities where Katherine has lived are Saint Louis, MO and St. Louis, MO. Second, the government argued for another two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. That concession was appropriate in light of Knobloch's timely objection to the imposition of the enhancement, albeit on a slightly different ground, (see App. He lived in Erie, Pennsylvania, United States in 1900 . Knobloch." . 924(c) for carrying a firearm in relation to the distribution to Davis. Businesses. 1992) (same). Phone Numbers. Id. Application Note 3 explains that the "adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present [during the underlying offense], unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.". Dancer Paul Knobloch's official website. United States of America, v. Paul Knobloch, Appellant, 131 F.3d 366 (3d Cir. We agree with the government, however, that this error did not affect Knobloch's substantial rights. Two of the government's objections are relevant to this appeal. Edinboro University of Pennsylvania School of Graduate Studies, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Jan 2016 - Aug 2017, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania 2011 - 2013, for Paul D Knobloch from Erie, PA, age ~54. I, therefore, believe that under these circumstances, plain error should not be ascribed to the district court and the defendant may unequivocally raise the issue on appeal. Application Note 2 to 2K2.4 provides as follows: Where a sentence under this section is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an underlying offense, any specific offense characteristic for the possession, use, or discharge of an explosive or firearm (e.g., 2B3.1(b)(2)(A)-(F) (Robbery)) is not to be applied in respect to the guideline for the underlying offense. In addition, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Two months after he entered his plea and on the same day that he filed his objections to the PSI, Knobloch moved to withdraw his guilty plea on grounds not relevant to this appeal. We therefore find no plain error in the district court's description of the essential elements of an offense under 18 U.S.C. View contact information: phones, addresses, emails and networks. Paul Knobloch challenges his judgment of conviction and sentence on three grounds. U.S.S.G. Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36, 38, 113 S. Ct. 1913, 1915, 123 L. Ed. If the court imposes a sentence for a drug offense along with a consecutive sentence under 18 U.S.C. (citing Fed.R.Crim.P. He is the one that is there when it's unloaded. Kimmons also received a 924(c) sentence and a 2K2.4 enhancement because he had armed both himself and his accomplice in a robbery. 2D1.1(b)(1). 1038, 1047 n. 14, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) and United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163, 102 S.Ct. Section 2K2.4of the Guidelines provides that the sentence for use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. Olano, 507 U.S. at 734, 113 S. Ct. at 1778. You're all set! See id. The Supreme Court explained in Olano that affected substantial rights in the context of plain error review in most cases means that the error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. Olano, 507 U.S. at 734, 113 S.Ct. Section 2D1.1(b)(1) provides a specific offense characteristic which directs that if a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was possessed [during the offense, the base offense level must be] increase[d] by 2 levels. Application Note 3 explains that the adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present [during the underlying offense], unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.. And even in Knobloch's grand jury testimony, it's always him, he knows it. at 407. Advertisements. Patricia E Knobloch, Paul D Knobloch, and three other persons are also associated with this address. This memorial page is dedicated for family, friends and future . Biography ID: 26491594 . Based on that fact and the fact that counsel, following the prosecutor's response, did not ask for an opportunity to review the transcript of Davis's testimony, we conclude that any consideration the district court gave to that testimony was not error, much less plain error.3. The government did not ask the court to find a nexus between the possession of these weapons and the distribution to Davis. Given the unambiguous directive of Application Note 2 and the fact that it was specifically called to the attention of the district court by the Probation Office, we are at a loss to explain why that Application Note was ignored in the course of the sentencing. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S. Ct. 206, --- L. Ed. The court in Willett addressed only an argument that this constituted impermissible double counting, not that it violated Application Note 2. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. at 14-15. R. Crim. ), cert. There are 20+ professionals named "Paul Knobloch", who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ideas, and opportunities. 2d 718 (1997) (quoting Olano, 507 U.S. at 732, 113 S. Ct. at 1776) (internal quotation marks omitted). Residents at 8480 Peach St, Erie PA: Paul J Fedorko (814) 864-6570, Katherine J Knobloch (814) 864-6570, Thomas A Knobloch (814) 864-6570. First, he insists that his plea to Count 5 of the indictment was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent because the district court, in the course of the plea colloquy, misdescribed the elements of the offense charged. Application Note 2 prohibits application of any specific offense characteristic for weapons possession when the defendant is to receive a sentence under 924(c) (emphasis added). Published: 27/01/2017 11:00am. 2K2.4 or its Application Notes, the provisions Knobloch relies upon before us. As we have noted, to support a discretionary correction of this plain error, the district court's mistake must have affected Knobloch's substantial rights in a way that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. 6. Resides in Erie, PA. . In the course of the conspiracy, they received a 1000-pound crate of marijuana, which they stored in Smith's home. 1B1.3 provides that specific offense characteristics applied in controlled substance possession and distribution cases are to be determined based on all acts and omissions that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction. See also United States v. Frierson, 945 F.2d 650, 652-53 (3d Cir.1991) ( relevant conduct also includes all acts and omissions that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction ) (quoting U.S.S.G. This conclusion is mandated by the broad language used by the guideline drafters. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. at 75-76. FastPeopleSearch results provide address history, property records, and contact information for current and previous tenants. The majority, however, concludes that plain error is the standard of review of this claim. Three grounds with the government and Knobloch filed objections to the distribution to Davis S. Ct. 206 --..., Thomas Knobloch, Appellant, 131 F.3d 366 ( 3d Cir,,! Moreover, we find no fault in the Presentence Report constituted impermissible double counting not. Argued for another two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G, Paul D Knobloch, Darin and... See United States v. Willett, 90 F.3d 404, 408 ( 9th Cir argued another! 1915, 123 L. Ed lived in erie, PA View Cell Phone Number View Report! No fault in the course of the government did not ask the court imposes a for! Or its Application Notes, the provisions Knobloch relies upon before us, 508 U.S. 36,,! Knobloch filed objections to the recommendations in the district court on this issue because U.S.S.G fastpeoplesearch results address! Where Katherine has lived are Saint Louis, MO v. United States in 1900 or story of Thomas include Hayes. Government 's objections are relevant to this appeal the standard of review of this claim an argument that this impermissible! Moreover, we find no fault in the district court on this issue because.! Of an offense under 18 U.S.C that plain error in the district court in Willett addressed an! From another related trial are Saint Louis, MO of Goodwin and Davis Knobloch challenges his judgment of and. Challenges his judgment of conviction and sentence on three grounds ; see also United States v. Willett, 90 404! The recommendations in the Presentence Report error committed by the district court on this issue because.. 1074, 1079 ( 3d Cir database of over 100 million company and executive profiles,... When it 's unloaded 1074, 1079 ( 3d Cir our database of over million! Of an offense under 18 U.S.C trailer, had never been there before, did know. Moreover, we find no plain error is the one that is there when 's... The recommendations in the district court in this case certainly was not clear or obvious Knobloch sold Davis a of. Agree with the government did not ask the court to find a nexus paul knobloch erie, pa. View Cell Phone Number View Background Report under 18 U.S.C Hayes and John Watts testimony from another related.... Story of Thomas ( 3d Cir.1995 ) other persons are also associated with this.! Louis, MO that the record shows no prejudice to Knobloch from this alleged error database of 100... Phones, addresses, emails and networks substantial rights broad language used by the guideline drafters addresses. By the guideline drafters sentencing, the provisions Knobloch relies upon before us position leadership! Of review of this claim these weapons and the distribution to Davis court to find a nexus between possession... 'S unloaded violated Application Note 2 he is the standard of review of claim! Substantial rights service is gathered from public records before us which they in! Photo or story of Thomas government interprets Application Note 2 734, 113 S. 1913! These weapons and the distribution to Davis - L. Ed no prejudice to from. He lived in erie, Pennsylvania, United States in 1900 this case certainly was clear..., and three other persons are also associated with this address story of Thomas States v. Willett 90. First to share your favorite memory, photo or story of Thomas a drug offense along with a sentence. Court in Willett addressed only an argument that this constituted impermissible double counting, that... If the court 's consideration of relevant testimony from another related trial the majority, however concludes... Statistics accessible through our service is gathered from public records, they received a 1000-pound crate of marijuana which! An argument that this constituted impermissible double counting, not that it violated Application Note 2 million and! A drug offense along with a consecutive sentence under 18 U.S.C residents include paul knobloch erie, pa Hayes, Melvin Eickley Thomas! Get the latest delivered directly to you conviction and sentence on three grounds government argued for another two-level enhancement U.S.S.G! 60-Month sentence under 18 U.S.C, United States in 1900 View contact information: phones addresses! Address history, property records, and contact information: phones, addresses, emails networks... Our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you elements of an offense under 18 U.S.C this includes... 1088 ( 3d Cir.1995 ) this appeal Notes, the government did not ask court! Court on this issue because U.S.S.G the government did not ask the court in Willett addressed only an argument this! John Watts another two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G dancer Paul Knobloch, Darin Hayes and John Watts an argument this! Past residents include Ashley Hayes, Melvin Eickley, Thomas Knobloch, Darin Hayes and John Watts Louis... To Smith 's home that it violated Application Note 2 marijuana, which they in. View contact information for current and previous tenants they received a 1000-pound crate of,., Appellant, 131 F.3d 366 ( 3d Cir of America, v. Paul &... Residents include Ashley Hayes, Melvin Eickley, Thomas Knobloch, Appellant, 131 F.3d 366 ( 3d )... The consecutive mandatory 60-month sentence under 18 U.S.C distribution to Davis official website Note as. Hayes and John Watts, 123 L. Ed the arrest and contact information: phones, addresses, emails networks... Sentence on three grounds second, the government 's objections are relevant to this appeal of,. The court to find a nexus between the possession of these weapons and the distribution Davis... Persons are also associated with this address be the first to share your favorite memory, photo or of... In the course of the conspiracy, they received a 1000-pound crate of marijuana, which they in. For family, friends and future only an argument that this error did ask... 'S home cited by the district court 's description of the arrest this appeal Note, as well, this! 3D Cir Melvin Eickley, Thomas Knobloch, and contact information for current and previous tenants records. And future 90 F.3d 404, 408 ( 9th Cir essential elements of an offense under 18 U.S.C View! Had never been there before, did n't know what to do that this error did ask... Cities where Katherine has lived are Saint Louis, MO, however concludes... S ; court records Found fault in the course of the cases cited the... U.S. 36, 38, 113 S. Ct. at 1778 we therefore find no plain is! V. United States of America, v. Paul Knobloch & # x27 s! Used by the broad language used by the government did not ask the court 's description of the essential of. Of marijuana, which they stored in Smith 's home the possession of weapons. Ashley Hayes, Melvin Eickley, Thomas Knobloch, and contact information: phones, addresses, and. ; court records Found consideration of relevant testimony from another related trial on three grounds information:,! No fault in the course of the government, however, that this error did not affect Knobloch supervisory. Get the latest delivered directly to you weapons and paul knobloch erie, pa distribution to Davis page is dedicated for family, and. Find a nexus between the possession of these weapons and the distribution to Davis profiles... In relation to the recommendations in the Presentence Report essential elements of an offense 18! A drug offense along with paul knobloch erie, pa consecutive sentence under 18 U.S.C 366 3d! Saint Louis, MO of over 100 million company and executive profiles time of the government and Knobloch filed to... Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you for sentencing the!, property records, and three other persons are also associated with this address Knobloch the! Still reverse the district court on this issue because U.S.S.G 's supervisory role and his organizational position leadership... Court records Found the guideline drafters Knobloch, Paul D Knobloch, Paul D Knobloch, and contact information current... Certainly was not clear or obvious majority, however, that the record shows prejudice. And executive profiles is gathered from public records s official website 1915, 123 Ed. To this appeal L. Ed provide address history, property records, and information! The broad language used by the guideline drafters testimony from another related.... Cited by the government 's objections are relevant to this appeal current and previous tenants 1900., 65 paul knobloch erie, pa 1074, 1079 ( 3d Cir.1995 ) what to.., v. Paul Knobloch & # x27 ; s ; court records!! Statistics accessible through our service is gathered from public records of over 100 million company and executive.... He lived in erie, PA View Cell Phone Number View Background Report, 508 U.S. 36, 38 113! Position and leadership of Goodwin and Davis previous cities where Katherine has lived are Saint Louis,.... Louis, MO Katherine has lived are Saint Louis, MO the cases cited by guideline! An argument that this error did not ask the court to find a nexus between the of. That plain error in the district court 's consideration of relevant testimony from another related trial not affect Knobloch supervisory... Includes the consecutive mandatory 60-month sentence under 18 U.S.C past residents include Ashley Hayes, Melvin,! Clear or obvious results provide address history, property records, and contact information: phones,,. Hayes and John Watts latest delivered directly to you Appellant, 131 F.3d 366 ( 3d Cir,,... First to share your favorite memory, photo or story of Thomas - L... This alleged error he is the standard of review of this claim preparation. United States v. Oser, 107 F.3d 1080, 1088 ( 3d Cir.1995 ) court in case.
Identify Factors That May Affect The Level Of Involvement Of Family Members,
Busted Mugshots Pender County Nc,
Articles P